Nicotinamide Riboside (NR) vs. Nicotinamide Mononucleotide (NMN): Which is Better?
Nicotinamide Riboside (NR) and Nicotinamide Mononucleotide (NMN) are two popular supplements that have gained attention for their potential to boost cellular NAD+ levels, which play a crucial role in cellular metabolism and energy production. Both have been studied for their potential benefits in aging, metabolic health, and overall longevity. This article will delve into the current scientific understanding of NR and NMN, comparing their effectiveness and safety based on available research.
What are NR and NMN?
Nicotinamide Riboside (NR) is a precursor to NAD+ (Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide), a vital coenzyme in the body that is involved in various metabolic processes, including energy production, DNA repair, and cellular stress responses.
Nicotinamide Mononucleotide (NMN) is another direct precursor to NAD+ and is involved in similar metabolic pathways as NR. NMN is converted directly into NAD+ through a series of enzymatic reactions.
Mechanism of Action
Both NR and NMN increase NAD+ levels, but they do so through slightly different pathways:
- NR is converted to NAD+ through a two-step process involving the enzymes NR kinase (NRK) and NAMPT.
- NMN is directly converted to NAD+ by the enzyme NMNAT.
Comparative Studies and Findings
- Bioavailability and Efficacy:
- A study published in Cell Metabolism compared the efficacy of NR and NMN in raising NAD+ levels in mice. The findings suggested that NMN might be more effective at increasing NAD+ levels in specific tissues, particularly in skeletal muscle and liver, compared to NR .
- Another study indicated that NMN has a higher bioavailability and can be rapidly absorbed and converted to NAD+ in tissues, while NR might require more steps to be effectively utilized .
- Metabolic Health and Aging:
- Research published in Nature Communications highlighted that NMN supplementation improved insulin sensitivity, enhanced physical activity, and ameliorated age-associated physiological decline in mice .
- Conversely, a study in Science Advances showed that NR supplementation also had beneficial effects on metabolism and aging, particularly in improving mitochondrial function and reducing age-related inflammation .
- Safety and Side Effects:
- Both NR and NMN have been studied for their safety profiles. A review in Nutrients indicated that both compounds are generally well-tolerated in humans, with minimal side effects at recommended dosages .
- Long-term safety studies are still needed, but short-term clinical trials have not reported significant adverse effects for either NR or NMN .
Conclusion
Both Nicotinamide Riboside (NR) and Nicotinamide Mononucleotide (NMN) show promise in boosting NAD+ levels and improving various aspects of metabolic health and aging. While NMN might have a slight edge in terms of bioavailability and rapid conversion to NAD+, NR is also effective and has shown significant benefits in various studies.
Ultimately, the choice between NR and NMN might come down to individual responses and specific health goals. Future research, especially long-term human clinical trials, will be crucial in determining the optimal choice for NAD+ supplementation.
One of our favorite scientifically proven anti-aging supplements is AEON which contains both NMN and NR in one capsule!
The company making AEON, Perpetua Life Biotech, is also a full-blown research & development firm with an impressive medical board of MD/PhD’s from around the globe. Their products are all developed, sourced, and manufactured in-house in the United States. All their facilities are also NSF/GMP audited, and FDA registered to ensure consistent quality.
If you try AEON feel free to use our coupon code BLOG for an additional 10% off your order at Perpetua.Life.
This comparison is based on the current state of scientific research. As new studies emerge, our understanding of the relative benefits of NR and NMN may evolve. Always consult healthcare professionals before starting any new supplement regimen.
